MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391935875 · doi:10.1109/tmi.2024.3367367

A Collaborative Self-Supervised Domain Adaptation for Low-Quality Medical Image Enhancement

2024· article· en· W4391935875 on OpenAlexaff
Qingshan Hou, Yaqi Wang, Peng Cao, Shuai Cheng, Linqi Lan, Jinzhu Yang, Xiaoli Liu, Osmar R. Zai͏̈ane

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage qualitySegmentationMedical imagingBenchmark (surveying)Quality (philosophy)Image segmentationAdaptation (eye)Computer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medical image analysis techniques have been employed in diagnosing and screening clinical diseases. However, both poor medical image quality and illumination style inconsistency increase uncertainty in clinical decision-making, potentially resulting in clinician misdiagnosis. The majority of current image enhancement methods primarily concentrate on enhancing medical image quality by leveraging high-quality reference images, which are challenging to collect in clinical applications. In this study, we address image quality enhancement within a fully self-supervised learning setting, wherein neither high-quality images nor paired images are required. To achieve this goal, we investigate the potential of self-supervised learning combined with domain adaptation to enhance the quality of medical images without the guidance of high-quality medical images. We design a Domain Adaptation Self-supervised Quality Enhancement framework, called DASQE. More specifically, we establish multiple domains at the patch level through a designed rule-based quality assessment scheme and style clustering. To achieve image quality enhancement and maintain style consistency, we formulate the image quality enhancement as a collaborative self-supervised domain adaptation task for disentangling the low-quality factors, medical image content, and illumination style characteristics by exploring intrinsic supervision in the low-quality medical images. Finally, we perform extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets of medical images, and the experimental results demonstrate that DASQE attains state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, we explore the impact of the proposed method on various clinical tasks, such as retinal fundus vessel/lesion segmentation, nerve fiber segmentation, polyp segmentation, skin lesion segmentation, and disease classification. The results demonstrate that DASQE is advantageous for diverse downstream image analysis tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207