A Collaborative Self-Supervised Domain Adaptation for Low-Quality Medical Image Enhancement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Medical image analysis techniques have been employed in diagnosing and screening clinical diseases. However, both poor medical image quality and illumination style inconsistency increase uncertainty in clinical decision-making, potentially resulting in clinician misdiagnosis. The majority of current image enhancement methods primarily concentrate on enhancing medical image quality by leveraging high-quality reference images, which are challenging to collect in clinical applications. In this study, we address image quality enhancement within a fully self-supervised learning setting, wherein neither high-quality images nor paired images are required. To achieve this goal, we investigate the potential of self-supervised learning combined with domain adaptation to enhance the quality of medical images without the guidance of high-quality medical images. We design a Domain Adaptation Self-supervised Quality Enhancement framework, called DASQE. More specifically, we establish multiple domains at the patch level through a designed rule-based quality assessment scheme and style clustering. To achieve image quality enhancement and maintain style consistency, we formulate the image quality enhancement as a collaborative self-supervised domain adaptation task for disentangling the low-quality factors, medical image content, and illumination style characteristics by exploring intrinsic supervision in the low-quality medical images. Finally, we perform extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets of medical images, and the experimental results demonstrate that DASQE attains state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, we explore the impact of the proposed method on various clinical tasks, such as retinal fundus vessel/lesion segmentation, nerve fiber segmentation, polyp segmentation, skin lesion segmentation, and disease classification. The results demonstrate that DASQE is advantageous for diverse downstream image analysis tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it