MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391935897 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2024.3366883

Enhanced Crop Discrimination and Monitoring Using Compact-Polarimetric SAR Signature Analysis From RADARSAT Constellation Mission

2024· article· en· W4391935897 on OpenAlexafffund
Hamid Jafarzadeh, Abhinav Verma, Masoud Mahdianpari, Avik Bhattacharya, Saeid Homayouni

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCentre For Cold Ocean Resources EngineeringMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersCanadian Space AgencyMinistère des relations internationales et de la Francophonie
KeywordsConstellationRemote sensingPolarimetrySynthetic aperture radarEnvironmental scienceSignature (topology)Computer scienceGeologyPhysicsMathematicsAstronomyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid advancements in SAR systems aiming for operational capabilities, crop characterization using Compact-Polarimetric (CP) Synthetic Aperture Radar (CP-SAR) data has gained considerable attention. This study thoroughly assesses the potential usefulness of C-band SAR data in CP mode using the RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM) for crop monitoring. The research unfolds across two separate phases: (1) extensive crop scattering characterization and (2) crop classification. In the first part, we introduce three descriptors: compact-polarimetric SAR signature ($CPS$), differential compact-polarimetric signature ($DCPS$), and the Geodesic Distance ($GD$) between signatures, to characterize the scattering pattern of four crop types: Soybean, Hay, Corn, and Cereal. We then derive the μ parameter and employ it in the$\mu -\chi$decomposition method. Time-series investigation of the proposed descriptors and the three power components:$P_{s}$,$P_{d}$, and$P_{v}$provides valuable insights into the scattering responses exhibited by crops, facilitating a robust assessment and tracking of their growing cycle, thus enabling the potential for improving crop discrimination. In the second part, we employ the$\mu -\chi$and$m-\chi$decompositions and wave descriptors to extract a stack of CP features for crop mapping. Combining diverse feature types and leveraging single and multi-date RCM images, classification experiments yield an optimal classification map with an overall accuracy of 89.71%, particularly when utilizing features extracted from multi-date datasets. This study illustrates a substantial effort in crop classification, underscoring the potential of the RCM Circular Polarization Synthetic Aperture Radar (CP-SAR) mission. Furthermore, our findings emphasize the potential of CP-SAR data from the RCM mission in contributing to precision agriculture and sustainable crop management practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207