“Veño de moi longas terras”: romances e onomástica no contexto educativo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O eixo central de Estudos de Onomástica Galega VIII é a relación da onomástica coa literatura popular, que foi transmitida oralmente durante xeracións, en épocas en que a lingua galega estaba vetada nos textos escritos. O uso dos nomes é significativo para entender a nosa idiosincrasia tamén en canto á comunicación, á complicidade ou aos sobreentendidos que nos unen como pobo. Os topónimos e os nomes de persoa no cancioneiro son o foco dos dous primeiros relatorios, a cargo de Domingo Blanco e Xosé Miranda Ruíz. Antonio Reigosa Carreiras céntrase na onomástica do conto galego de tradición oral e Elena Freire Paz na relación entre a onomástica e a antropoloxía en Galicia. A cantora, improvisadora e filóloga Alba María comparte a súa experiencia co alumnado de secundaria centrándose nas posibilidades que dá o emprego da onomástica nas improvisacións, un xénero moi vivo na nosa literatura oral. Todos eles neste volume queren abrir novas perspectivas de estudo da ciencia onomástica a aspectos pouco analizados entre nós, xerar debate científico e divulgar e normalizar os nomes propios persoais e de lugar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".