“Veño de moi longas terras”: romances e onomástica no contexto educativo
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O eixo central de Estudos de Onomástica Galega VIII é a relación da onomástica coa literatura popular, que foi transmitida oralmente durante xeracións, en épocas en que a lingua galega estaba vetada nos textos escritos. O uso dos nomes é significativo para entender a nosa idiosincrasia tamén en canto á comunicación, á complicidade ou aos sobreentendidos que nos unen como pobo. Os topónimos e os nomes de persoa no cancioneiro son o foco dos dous primeiros relatorios, a cargo de Domingo Blanco e Xosé Miranda Ruíz. Antonio Reigosa Carreiras céntrase na onomástica do conto galego de tradición oral e Elena Freire Paz na relación entre a onomástica e a antropoloxía en Galicia. A cantora, improvisadora e filóloga Alba María comparte a súa experiencia co alumnado de secundaria centrándose nas posibilidades que dá o emprego da onomástica nas improvisacións, un xénero moi vivo na nosa literatura oral. Todos eles neste volume queren abrir novas perspectivas de estudo da ciencia onomástica a aspectos pouco analizados entre nós, xerar debate científico e divulgar e normalizar os nomes propios persoais e de lugar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it