Sistem pendukung keputusan penilaian kepuasan masyarakat terhadap pelayanan di pt. Putri manalu bersaudara menggunakan metode oreste
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sistem Pendukung Keputusan merupakan sistem yang mampu menyediakan dara informasi. Pengambilan keputusan dilakukan secara sistematis, mengumpulkan fakta-fakta, kemudian ada penentuan yang matang dari alternatif yang dihadapi, dan selanjutnya mengambil tindakan yang menurut perhitungan merupakan tindakan yang paling tepat. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan lebih ditujukan untuk mendukung manajemen dalam melakukan pekerjaan yang bersifat analitis dalam situasi yang kurang terstruktur dengan kriteria yang kurang jelas. Metode Oreste adalah salah satu metode pengambilan keputusan multi criteria atau yang lebih dikenal dengani stilah Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). MCDM digunakan untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan dengan kriteria yang bertentangan untuk dapat mengambil keputusan untuk mencapai keputusan akhir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it