MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391945897 · doi:10.1080/02722011.2023.2292896

Truth, History, and a Canadian Identity: Philosophy and the Murdoch Mysteries, Seasons One to Nine

2023· article· en· W4391945897 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Review of Canadian Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and Literary Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)PhilosophyEpistemologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article argues that the Murdoch Mysteries series as a collective whole can be read as a definitive text on the Canadian psyche, on its cultural identity, and its underlying philosophy. Canada shares a history with the United States, and because of this, Canada’s peace, freedom, common order, and prosperity, all elements of its identity and moral character, have been defined contingently upon its geopolitical relationship to the United States. The series illustrates that foundational philosophies are not irrelevant to perceptions of truth or interpretations of historical events, that historical narratives may play a role in the formation of the culture and its principles and practices of morality, and that together law and morality define the character and identity of a people.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it