MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391946754 · doi:10.1039/d3sc05735f

Non-invasive single cell aptasensing in live cells and animals

2024· article· en· W4391946754 on OpenAlexafffund
Eiman A. Osman, Thomas P. Rynes, Yitao Wang, K Mruk, Maureen McKeague

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsZebrafishCellCell biologyComputational biologyNanotechnologyBiologyChemistryMaterials scienceBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a genetically encoded aptamer biosensor platform for non-invasive measurement of drug distribution in cells and animals. We combined the high specificity of aptamer molecular recognition with the easy-to-detect properties of fluorescent proteins. We generated six encoded aptasensors, showcasing the platform versatility. The biosensors display high sensitivity and specificity for detecting their specific drug target over related analogs. We show dose dependent response of biosensor performance reaching saturating drug uptake levels in individual live cells. We designed our platform for integration into animal genomes; thus, we incorporated aptamer biosensors into zebrafish, an important model vertebrate. The biosensors enabled non-invasive drug biodistribution imaging in whole animals across different timepoints. To our knowledge, this is the first example of an aptamer biosensor-expressing transgenic vertebrate that is carried through generations. As such, our encoded platform addresses the need for non-invasive whole animal biosensing ideal for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses that can be expanded to other organisms and to detect diverse molecules of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ScienceSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207