Rapid changes in synchronizability in conductance-based neuronal networks with conductance-based coupling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Real neurons connect to each other non-randomly. These connectivity graphs can potentially impact the ability of networks to synchronize, along with the dynamics of neurons and the dynamics of their connections. How the connectivity of networks of conductance-based neuron models like the classical Hodgkin-Huxley model or the Morris-Lecar model impacts synchronizability remains unknown. One powerful tool to resolve the synchronizability of these networks is the master stability function (MSF). Here, we apply and extend the MSF approach to networks of Morris-Lecar neurons with conductance-based coupling to determine under which parameters and for which graphs the synchronous solutions are stable. We consider connectivity graphs with a constant non-zero row sum, where the MSF approach can be readily extended to conductance-based synapses rather than the more well-studied diffusive connectivity case, which primarily applies to gap junction connectivity. In this formulation, the synchronous solution is a single, self-coupled, or "autaptic" neuron. We find that the primary determining parameter for the stability of the synchronous solution is, unsurprisingly, the reversal potential, as it largely dictates the excitatory/inhibitory potential of a synaptic connection. However, the change between "excitatory" and "inhibitory" synapses is rapid, with only a few millivolts separating stability and instability of the synchronous state for most graphs. We also find that for specific coupling strengths (as measured by the global synaptic conductance), islands of synchronizability in the MSF can emerge for inhibitory connectivity. We verified the stability of these islands by direct simulation of pairs of neurons coupled with eigenvalues in the matching spectrum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".