MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391955045 · doi:10.18260/1-2--37485

Mastery Learning for Undergraduates in Engineering

2024· article· en· W4391955045 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicE-Learning and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsCARE CanadaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObsolescenceLifelong learningEngineering educationExcellenceOrder (exchange)Computer scienceMathematics educationPsychologyPerfectionEngineering managementPedagogyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper gives examples on the importance of mastery learning, that is learning a profession to its perfection and even extending it to excellence, in engineering education and in engineering training, such as the CO-OPs, especially during the undergraduate years.In order to achieve it, only academic counselling is not enough; it needs a more intimate 'mentoring' for both incoming Freshmen and outgoing Senior undergraduates.During the present crisis of COVID-19 and in the post-COVID-19 scenario thereafter in engineering education, when online instructions are rapidly replacing in-presence lectures at the undergraduate level, mastery learning is even more important in order to avoid professional limitations, and in the long run of lifelong learning, professional obsolescence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it