MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391956289 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-cpbk5

Site-Selective Benzylic C–H Hydroxylation in Electron-Deficient Azaheterocycles

2024· preprint· en· W4391956289 on OpenAlexafffund
Milanpreet Kaur, Julian C. Cooper, Jeffrey F. Van Humbeck

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationMassachusetts Institute of Technology
KeywordsChemistryElectrophileHydroxylationCombinatorial chemistryReagentSelectivitySubstrate (aquarium)Hydrogen atomPyrimidinePhotochemistryHydrogen bondMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryCatalysisGroup (periodic table)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Benzylic C–H bonds can be converted into numerous functional groups, often by mechanisms that involve hydrogen atom transfer at the key bond breaking step. The abstracting species is most often an electrophilic radical, which makes these reactions best suited to electron-rich C–H bonds to achieve appropriate polarity matching. Thus, electron deficient systems such as pyridine and pyrimidine are relatively unreactive, and relatively underrpresented in substrate scopes. In this report, we describe a new method for benzylic hydroxylation—essentially an unknown reaction in the case of pyrimidines—that makes use of an iodine(III) reagent to affords very high selectivity towards electron-deficient azaheterocycles in substrates with more than one reactive position and prevents over-oxidation to carbonyl products. The identification of key reaction byproducts supports a mechanism that involves radical coupling in the bond forming step.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicCatalytic C–H Functionalization MethodsFrench-language works237,207