Diffusive dynamics of a model protein chain in solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Markov state model is a powerful tool that can be used to track the evolution of populations of configurations in an atomistic representation of a protein. For a coarse-grained linear chain model with discontinuous interactions, the transition rates among states that appear in the Markov model when the monomer dynamics is diffusive can be determined by computing the relative entropy of states and their mean first passage times, quantities that are unchanged by the specification of the energies of the relevant states. In this paper, we verify the folding dynamics described by a diffusive linear chain model of the crambin protein in three distinct solvent systems, each differing in complexity: a hard-sphere solvent, a solvent undergoing multi-particle collision dynamics, and an implicit solvent model. The predicted transition rates among configurations agree quantitatively with those observed in explicit molecular dynamics simulations for all three solvent models. These results suggest that the local monomer-monomer interactions provide sufficient friction for the monomer dynamics to be diffusive on timescales relevant to changes in conformation. Factors such as structural ordering and dynamic hydrodynamic effects appear to have minimal influence on transition rates within the studied solvent densities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".