Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tables 3.1 Breastfeeding initiation and duration by class in Toronto, 1900 and 1917 / 42 7.1 Breastfeeding initiation rates by region, late 1960s and 1978 / 121 7.2 Changes in recommended length of breastfeeding, age of introduction of solids, and suggested supplements, 1923, 1940, 1967, 1979 / 125 8.1 Summary of international code of marketing of breast milk substitutes / 133 8.2 Number of hours infant spent with mother in hospital with rooming-in programs versus hospitals with non-rooming-in programs in 1980 / 144 8.3 Provincial variations in hospital practices that influenced breastfeeding initiation in 1980 / 145 9.1 Ten steps to successful breastfeeding / 154 9.2 Members of the Expert Working Group on Breastfeeding / 156 9.3 Women's breastfeeding rights by province/territory, 2000 / 168 9.4 Breastfeeding initiation and duration rates in Canada, 1994-95 / 172 9.5 Seven-point plan for the protection, promotion, and support of breastfeeding in community health care settings / 174 9.6 Ten steps to baby-friendly communities / 175
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.904 | 0.754 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".