MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391963708 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.029901

Erratum: Measurements of the suppression and correlations of dijets in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Pb</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>Pb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> collisions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.02</mml:mn><mml:mo> </mml:mo><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> [Phys. Rev. C <b>107</b>, 054908 (2023)]

2024· erratum· lv· W4391963708 on OpenAlexfundno aff
G. Aad, et al.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2024
Typeerratum
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Social FundFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNarodowa Agencja Wymiany AkademickiejCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueIsrael Science FoundationJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftGeneralitat ValencianaAustrian Science FundEuropean Regional Development FundBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science FoundationAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFCompute CanadaMax-Planck-GesellschaftRoyal SocietyDanmarks GrundforskningsfondBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundTürkiye Enerji, Nükleer ve Maden Araştırma KurumuAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloGeneralitat de CatalunyaCanarieDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaCERNLeverhulme TrustMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean Commission
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207