Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1932, A.M. Klein had this to say about the phenomenon of antisemitism in Canada: "Anti-Semitism in this country is a mild affair compared with the persistent and malignant forms which it assumes in some countries." 2 Over eighty years later, the situation of antisemitism in Canada could well be summarized in a similar way.Thus the index of Robert Wistrich's exhaustive 2010 publication A Lethal Obsession: Anti-Semitism from Antiquity to the Global Jihad indicates a mere thirteen pages referring to "Canada" as opposed to well over one hundred for a country like France, not including an entirely separate series of references to "French anti-Semitism." 3 Why, then, devote an entire volume to the subject of antisemitism in Canada, especially given the fact that Jews were never the sole targets of national, racial, and religious vilification in Canada?For the moment, let us begin by saying that antisemitism has become and remains an important component of the historical memory and contemporary consciousness of Canadian Jews as well as of the cultural and political discourse of Canada.Despite that reality there is, as yet, no comprehensive study of the phenomenon of antisemitism in Canada. 4
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".