Menilik Peran Dewan Perwakilan Daerah dalam Pembangunan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Barat dan Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Regional Representative Council (DPD) as a regional representative institution that has a character of representation based on regions is essentially a character of broader representation of the DPR, because the dimension of representation is based on all the people contained in these regions. DPD as a new state institution after the amendment to the 1945 Constitution was initially expected to realize a bicameral system, as a representative body of the people, the DPD has functions as regulated in the 194 5 Constitution. These functions are legislative functions, functions budget, and consideration functions. However, according to the Indonesian constitutional system the authority of the DPD is still very limited. All tasks and authorities of the DPD are limited to aspects that are closely related to the region. In carrying out its role and function as the second chamber in the Indonesian bicameral system, the Regional Representative Council is considered to have some weaknesses. including in terms of accommodating the aspirations of the region and the ineffectiveness of the role of the Regional Representative Council in carrying out all functions that have been given to the DPD by the 1945 Constitution. These constraints have an impact not only at the central level but also at the regional level. The limitations of the DPD also have an impact on regional development and national development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it