A sensitive and scalable fluorescence anisotropy single stranded RNA targeting approach for monitoring riboswitch conformational states
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The capacity of riboswitches to undergo conformational changes in response to binding their native ligands is closely tied to their functional roles and is an attractive target for antimicrobial drug design. Here, we established a probe-based fluorescence anisotropy assay to monitor riboswitch conformational switching with high sensitivity and throughput. Using the Bacillus subtillis yitJ S-Box (SAM-I), Fusobacterium nucleatum impX RFN element of (FMN) and class-I cyclic-di-GMP from Vibrio cholerae riboswitches as model systems, we developed short fluorescent DNA probes that specifically recognize either ligand-free or -bound riboswitch conformational states. We showed that increasing concentrations of native ligands cause measurable and reproducible changes in fluorescence anisotropy that correlate with riboswitch conformational changes observed by native gel analysis. Furthermore, we applied our assay to several ligand analogues and confirmed that it can discriminate between ligands that bind, triggering the native conformational change, from those that bind without causing the conformational change. This new platform opens the possibility of high-throughput screening compound libraries to identify potential new antibiotics that specifically target functional conformational changes in riboswitches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".