Oral and General-Health Quality of Life following a Subtemporal Preauricular Infratemporal Approach with Condylar Fossa Osteotomy in Surgical Skull-Base Tumor Resection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Although temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders constitute a significant portion of public health, it is poorly appreciated in the neurosurgical field despite its high prevalence of procedures that invoke TMJ disruption. Chondrosarcomas (CS) resection in particular is problematic; these tumors are centered at the petroclival suture often requiring the subtemporal preauricular infratemporal (SPI) approach with condylar fossa osteotomy. With this necessary TMJ disruption, patients can have significant symptomatology and exacerbation of premorbid impaired quality of life. Despite conjecture regarding the morbidity of this approach and others advocating TMJ sparing approaches, there remains an absence of studies that assess oral health quality of life (OHQoL). To our knowledge, this is the first article to present long-term results of general health-related quality of life (GHRQoL) and OHRQoL among surgically managed patients to evaluate the effects of TMJ disruption in the SPI approach for skull-base tumor resection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".