MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A 94 GHz Bandwidth Transimpedance Amplifier in 55nm SiGe BiCMOS for High Speed Optical Receivers

2024· article· en· W4391991823 on OpenAlexaff
Lachlan Cuskelly, C. Falt, Peter Schvan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsCiena (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransimpedance amplifierBiCMOSBandwidth (computing)AmplifierOptical amplifierOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringMaterials scienceComputer scienceOperational amplifierPhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringOpticsTransistorVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A transimpedance amplifier with a bandwidth of 94 GHz is presented and on chip measurements are discussed. The measured gain of the amplifier at low frequencies is 55 $\mathrm{dB}\Omega$, peaking to 61 $\mathrm{dB}\Omega$ at 78 GHz. The circuit was designed in a cutting edge 55nm SiGe BiCMOS technology, occupies a pad limited area of 0.02 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>, and consumes 14 m A of current from a 3.3V supply. The circuit achieves an average input referred current noise of 11 pA/$\sqrt{Hz}$, making it suitable for future high speed optical receivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207