MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391995855 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.3c03077

Shape-Based Pattern Recognition Approaches toward Oscillation Detection

2024· article· en· W4391995855 on OpenAlexafffund
Amirreza Memarian, Seshu Kumar Damarla, Biao Huang, Zhengang Han, Mik Marvan

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsShell (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceOscillation (cell signaling)Artificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oscillation in control loops is a frequent problem in the process industries. These oscillations directly impact product quality, leading to a decreased plant profit. Additionally, oscillations increase energy consumption and waste raw materials and pose a significant restriction on the performance of the operational unit. Therefore, it is essential to isolate the loops that exhibit oscillations. In this work, two practical and effective methods are proposed to detect oscillations in process control loops. Both methods are aimed at detecting the presence of a triangle-like shape in the “ D vs process variable (PV)” [or “ D vs controller output (OP)”] plot to identify oscillations in the control loops. Here, “ D ” represents the Euclidean distance, which involves the deviations from the mean values of the variables OP and PV. Method 1 accomplishes this objective in an unsupervised manner by fitting a nonlinear algebraic function to the data: “ D ” and “PV”. Method 2 uses a deep convolutional neural network for detecting the triangle-like shape. The performance of both the methods was evaluated by applying them to benchmark control loops sourced from various industries, including chemical, paper, mining, and metal industries, along with control loops in a local refinery unit. While both methods have their own advantages and application scenarios, the results demonstrated that both the proposed methods identified oscillatory control loops for the majority of the cases studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207