Personalized medicine in radiation oncology and radiation sensitivity index: Pathbreaking genomic way to define the role of radiation in cancer management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACTS: The technological developments associated with the branch of Radiation Oncology have been directed towards precise delivery of the dose, leading to improved survival in various solid malignancies. Radiation therapy as a treatment modality, is an integral component of more than half of the diagnosed malignancies. In spite of the role of adaptive radiation therapy evolving over the last decade, the fundamental question remains as to the difference in radiation response between individuals. Recently, the role of the radiosensitivity index has emerged, which has shown immense potential in the development of biologically driven tumor radiation therapy. The role of these novel methods of genome-based molecular assays needs to be explored to help in decision-making between radical treatment options for various malignancies and reduce the associated toxicity burden. In this article, we explore the current evidence available for various malignancy sites and provide a comprehensive review of the predictive values of various molecular markers available and their impact on the radiosensitivity index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".