Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leila D'Arc de Souza 2Este artigo relata a experiência com a instituição social não governamental Casa Frida por ocasião da realização do Projeto Interventivo -PI, aprovado e referendado como prática avaliativa de finalização do curso de aperfeiçoamento Educação, Pobreza e Desigualdade Social -EPDS Promovido pelo MEC em parceria com a Universidade de Brasília, em sua primeira edição no Distrito Federal.O referido projeto de intervenção de Escrita Criativa à Moda Frida, foi desenvolvido dentro da proposta do curso e em consonância com a linha de trabalho da instituição Casa Frida com público de mulheres pobres que foram vítimas de violência.Os objetivos principais foram fortalecer os vínculos das mulheres vítimas de violência com a Casa Frida e visibilizar suas histórias de vida, a partir do seu registro e ressignificação por meio da escrita criativa; fazer uma reflexão sobre os aspectos sociais que levam à agressão às mulheres;
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.088 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".