Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Quantitative Perfusion <scp>MRI</scp>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Imaging techniques that quantitatively and automatically measure changes in the myocardial microcirculation in patients with diabetes are lacking. PURPOSE: To detect diabetic myocardial microvascular complications using a novel automatic quantitative perfusion MRI technique, and to explore the relationship between myocardial microcirculation dysfunction and fibrosis. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: 101 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (53 without and 48 with complications), 20 healthy volunteers. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T; modified Look-Locker inversion-recovery sequence; saturation recovery sequence and dual-bolus technique; segmented fast low-angle shot sequence. ASSESSMENT: All participants underwent MRI to determine the rest myocardial blood flow (MBF), stress MBF, myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR), and extracellular volume (ECV), which represents the extent of myocardial fibrosis. STATISTICAL TESTS: Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Shapiro-Wilk test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Spearman correlation coefficient, multivariable linear regression analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The rest MBF was not significantly different between the T2DM without complications group (1.1, IQR: 0.9-1.3) and the control group (1.1, 1.0-1.3) (P = 1.000), but it was significantly lower in the T2DM with complications group (0.8, 0.6-1.0) than in both other groups. The stress MBF and MPR were significantly lower in the T2DM without complications group (1.9, 1.5-2.3, and 1.7, 1.4-2.1, respectively) than in the control group (3.0, 2.6-3.5, and 2.7, 2.4-3.1, respectively), and were also significantly lower in the T2DM with complications group (1.1, 0.9-1.4, and 1.4, 1.2-1.8, respectively) than in the T2DM without complications group. A decrease in MBF and MPR were significantly associated with an increase in the ECV. DATA CONCLUSION: Quantitative perfusion MRI can evaluate myocardial microcirculation dysfunction. In T2DM, there was a significant decrease in both MBF and MPR compared to healthy controls, with the decrease being significantly different between T2DM with and without complications groups. The decrease of MBF was significantly associated with the development of myocardial fibrosis, as determined by ECV. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".