MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392014631 · doi:10.32920/25254523

Investigating the Sublethal Effects of Cannabis sativa on Earthworms and Trematode Cercariae

2024· preprint· en· W4392014631 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Williams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pest Control Strategies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlatwormBiologyCannabis sativaIngestionInvertebrateEarthwormToxicologyHormesisZoologyBotanyEcologyEndocrinologyOxidative stress

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Rising demand for <em>Cannabis sativa</em> production and use has resulted in recent rapid widespread legalization and large-scale production. Due to its abundance and variety of unique secondary metabolites, <em>C. sativa</em> cultivation could pose a risk to natural terrestrial and aquatic environments. Currently, its general effects on invertebrate animals are not well studied beyond lethality. Here, I investigated how ingestion of <em>C. sativa</em> plant material affected the growth, mortality, and behaviour of an earthworm species. Earthworms that fed on <em>C. sativa</em> gained less weight and took longer to escape from an external heat stimulus. However, mortality and escape behaviour from an external light stimulus were not affected. I also investigated if exposure to aqueous cannabinoids affected the activity and longevity of free-swimming infectious cercariae of trematode (flatworm) parasites. Neither high nor low concentrations of cannabinoid solutions had any effects. Exposure to <em>C. sativa</em> could thus have some effects on non-target organisms.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInsect Pest Control StrategiesFrench-language works237,207