MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392014775 · doi:10.1090/btran/178

Global dynamics for the stochastic KdV equation with white noise as initial data

2024· article· en· W4392014775 on OpenAlexafffund
Tadahiro Oh, Jeremy Quastel, Philippe Sosoe

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society Series B · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsWhite noiseDynamics (music)Korteweg–de Vries equationNoise (video)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisStatisticsAcousticsNonlinear systemComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation (SKdV) with an additive space-time white noise forcing, posed on the one-dimensional torus. In particular, we construct global-in-time solutions to SKdV with spatial white noise initial data. Due to the lack of an invariant measure, Bourgain’s invariant measure argument is not applicable to this problem. In order to overcome this difficulty, we implement a variant of Bourgain’s argument in the context of an evolution system of measures and construct global-in-time dynamics. Moreover, we show that the white noise measure with variance 1 + t 1+t is an evolution system of measures for SKdV with the white noise initial data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society Series BSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Physics ProblemsFrench-language works237,207