MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392016937 · doi:10.1080/00927872.2024.2316311

On Hopf algebras whose coradical is a cocentral abelian cleft extension

2024· article· en· W4392016937 on OpenAlexafffund
Gastón Andrés García, Mitja Mastnak

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Algebra · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsHopf algebraMathematicsAbelian groupInteger (computer science)Pure mathematicsExtension (predicate logic)Dimension (graph theory)Simple (philosophy)Representation theory of Hopf algebrasAlgebra over a fieldQuasitriangular Hopf algebraDivision algebraAlgebra representation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is a first step toward the full description of a family of Hopf algebras whose coradical is isomorphic to a semisimple Hopf algebra Kn , n an odd positive integer, obtained by a cocentral abelian cleft extension. We describe the simple Yetter-Drinfeld modules, compute the fusion rules and determine the finite-dimensional Nichols algebras for some of them. In particular, we give the description of the finite-dimensional Nichols algebras over simple modules over K3. This includes a family of 12-dimensional Nichols algebras {Bξ} depending on 3rd roots of unity. Here, B1 is isomorphic to the well-known Fomin-Kirillov algebra, and Bξ≃Bξ2 as graded algebras but B1 is not isomorphic to Bξ as algebra for ξ≠1. As a byproduct we obtain new Hopf algebras of dimension 216.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in AlgebraSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207