MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Public Opinion, News, Digital Media, and Foreign Policy

2024· book-chapter· en· W4392022822 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Christophe Boucher

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCultural Differences and Values
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceDigital mediaPublic opinionMedia studiesAdvertisingInternet privacyComputer scienceBusinessSociologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter looks at the current state of the field of public opinion, and news and digital media. The central question organizing this research programme focuses on measuring and delineating the interactive relationship between the public, news media—and to some extent social media—and decision-makers. The literature on these issues is extensive and both theoretically and empirically rich and well developed. Nevertheless, with the rapid digitalization of our modern society, it is a field of research ready for disruption. New research questions on the role of the digital world in the realm of foreign policy as well as the development of new methodologies, especially those assisted by artificial intelligence, will possibly represent the future of Foreign Policy Analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicCultural Differences and ValuesFrench-language works237,207