Events to Span Knowledge Boundaries for Open Innovation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Open innovation (OI) has acknowledged the importance of managing knowledge flows outside firm boundaries to enhance innovation. However, OI researchers have not explored the complexity of managing these knowledge flows across domains in practice. This chapter builds on the knowledge boundaries perspective to expand current understanding of knowledge work in OI contexts by nuancing the different types of knowledge flows occurring across domains and exploring the types of boundary processes needed to support the creation and development of these knowledge flows outside organizational and specialized domain boundaries. It analyzes the case of Hacking Health, a non-profit organization that developed a series of events to develop a variety of boundary processes (gathering, transferring, translating, transcending, transforming) that address different types of knowledge boundaries that emerge in the fuzzy front end of OI phenomena in the nascent industry of digital health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it