Temporal effective stress response of soil elements below the base of an excavation in sensitive clay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Investigations into the temporally evolving stress state below the base of excavations and underground structures are very scarce, in contrast to studies of horizontal earth pressures during the construction stage. Therefore in this work, the measured temporal response in terms of vertical and horizontal effective stresses and displacements below a tunnel slab at the base of an excavation located in a deep sensitive clay deposit is reported. In addition to the measured unloading response over time, the completeness of the site description and complementary measurements enables future benchmarking of numerical models at boundary and element level. Instrument clusters of earth pressure cells and piezometers were installed at three locations in one cross-section. The monitoring data allow the interpretation of effective stress paths and stress ratios, K = [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text], at soil element level covering the construction and the serviceability stages. The in situ stress ratios enable a unique comparison to prior laboratory studies of K during unloading. The data presented herein on the evolution of K corroborate, although approximately, previous studies at laboratory scale. Furthermore, at system level, the monitoring data reveal the intricate interplay between deformations resulting from excavation and pile driving.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".