MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392033553 · doi:10.32920/25266754.v1

Motion Vector Extrapolation for Video Object Detection

2024· preprint· en· W4392033553 on OpenAlexaff
Julian True

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtrapolationComputer visionMotion vectorArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMotion (physics)Object (grammar)Object detectionComputer graphics (images)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsStatisticsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Despite the continued successes of computationally efficient deep neural network architectures for video object detection, performance continually arrives at the great trilemma of speed versus accuracy versus computational resources (pick two). Current attempts to exploit temporal information in video data to overcome this trilemma are bottlenecked by the state-of-the-art in object detection models. This work presents Motion Vector Extrapolation (MOVEX), a technique which performs video object detection through the use of off-the-shelf object detectors alongside existing optical flow based motion estimation techniques in parallel. This work demonstrates that this approach significantly reduces the baseline latency of any given object detector without sacrificing accuracy performance. Further latency reductions, up to 24× lower than the original latency, can be achieved with minimal accuracy loss. MOVEX enables low latency video object detection on common CPU based systems, thus allowing for high performance video object detection beyond the domain of GPU computing.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Processing Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207