MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392058001 · doi:10.4171/jst/488

Counting eigenvalues of Schrödinger operators using the landscape function

2024· article· en· W4392058001 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spectral Theory · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsSchrödinger's catMathematicsFunction (biology)Mathematical analysisPure mathematicsMathematical physicsPhysicsApplied mathematicsQuantum mechanicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove an upper and a lower bound on the rank of the spectral projections of the Schrödinger operator -\Delta + V in terms of the volume of the sublevel sets of an effective potential \frac{1}{u} . Here, u is the ‘landscape function’ of G. David, M. Filoche, and S. Mayboroda [Adv. Math. 390 (2021), article no. 107946], namely a solution of (-\Delta + V)u = 1 in \mathbb R^{d} . We prove the result for non-negative potentials satisfying a Kato-type and a doubling condition, in all spatial dimensions, in infinite volume, and show that no coarse-graining is required. Our result yields in particular a necessary and sufficient condition for discreteness of the spectrum. In the case of nonnegative polynomial potentials, we prove that the spectrum is discrete if and only if no directional derivative vanishes identically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it