Vulnerability assessment of tall isolated steel building under variable earthquake hazard levels using endurance time method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this research, the superstructure behavior in isolated structures has been studied based on their ductility. For this purpose, three tall structures isolated by triple friction pendulum isolators (TFPI) have been designed. The ductility of superstructures is different due to their different seismic force-resisting systems. The performance of the structures has been evaluated by endurance time (ET) method. This method significantly reduces nonlinear dynamic analysis time by optimizing the number of desired earthquake records to one to three endurance time excitation functions (ETEFs). Additionally, the seismic response of structures under different earthquake hazard levels can be achieved by this method. Results show that the change in ratio of the isolator period to the superstructure period (TI/TS) can affect floor acceleration, TFPI displacement and interstory drift ratio (IDR). However, TFPI displacement and IDR are also sensitive to the type of superstructure system, whether it is a braced frame or a moment frame. Moreover, there is a possibility of entering the collapse phase of structural components in tall isolated structures with braced or moment frame which are designed by linear static and spectral methods, under an earthquake with a return period equal to the earthquake hazard level considered in the design step.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".