MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392080765 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v10i2.2136

How To Correct Vision In Strabismic Children

2023· article· en· W4392080765 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Saleh.A. Alsharif, Mukhlid.S. Alzahrani, Majed.M. Alkhalaf, Mubarak.A. Alshreef, Sultan A. Alqahtani, Trad.S. Almatrafi, Awad.M. Alzubide, Saleh.R. Alhodaly, Wejdan Ahmed Alghamdi, Mona.Alhassan. Alsalami, Mamdoh.E. Aharthi, Abdulaziz.A. Alwi, Ghaleha.S. Alghamdi, Maryam.N. Khawagy, Mohammed.Alhumaidi. Almutairi, Fatmah.A. Alghamdi, Yasser.M. Majrshy, Badria.S. Alghamdi, Hamad.J. Alsharifi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrabismusMobile phoneMeaning (existential)PhoneOptometryPsychologyComputer scienceMedicineTelecommunicationsPsychotherapistOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the current study is, what is the meaning of strabismus, what are the causes of strabismus in children, what are the types of strabismus, what is the treatment for vision correction in strabismus children, the questionnaire was created electronically via the Google Drive program, and then it was distributed via mobile phone on the social networking program (WhatsApp). using e-mail for all participants to respond to the questionnaire. 600 questionnaires were distributed to all mobile groups, and 550 questionnaires were received on the researcher’s e-mail. (the target group is residents of the holy city of Mecca, aged 25-60 years).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.413
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.072 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicOphthalmology and Visual Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207