MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392086690 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.2024633028

Can We Disregard the Regional Context Now Graff/Venus Discoveries have De-Risked Magmatic Margins? In Short, No!

2024· article· en· W4392086690 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas Paton, Paul Markwick, J. Salomo, Estelle Mortimer, M. Parker-Nance, Pablo Gristo, Josefina Marmisolle, Rodrigo Real

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsMinnow Environmental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVenusContext (archaeology)AstrobiologyComputer scienceGeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary As Graff/Venus have de-risked the margin therefore can we forget about regional context? A reminder about the importance of understanding the wider petroleum system for future discoveries Graff/Venus discoveries de-risked the margin - therefore we can move-away from regional context… or can we? As Graff and Venus have de-risked the margin let’s forget the regional context! No of course not! Can we disregard the regional context now Graff/Venus discoveries have de-risked magmatic margins? In short – no!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.020
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0060.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and Exploration→French-language works237,207→