Points de vue d’élèves ayant des besoins particuliers et de leurs personnes intervenantes sur un Programme d’activités de plein air
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les élèves ayant des besoins particuliers (EBP) éprouvent des difficultés de participation en éducation physique (Wang, 2019). Les activités de plein air peuvent pallier leurs difficultés par leur effet sur le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle (Russell et Walsh, 2011). Le but de la recherche est de décrire les perceptions d’EBP (n=12) du secondaire et de personnes intervenantes (n=6) sur un Programme d’activités de plein air. Des entrevues semi- dirigées révèlent des propos associés aux expériences vicariantes, aux expériences actives de maitrise et à la persuasion verbale (Bandura, 2007), entre autres, par l’établissement d’un climat émotionnel sécuritaire et aux défis optimaux offerts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".