Short-Term Forecasting of Electricity Consumption Using Fuzzy Logic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The high demand for electricity in the production process at PT Semen Padang requires a system that can cope with various kinds of disturbances. The problem is that the need for electrical loads is dynamic, especially in the short term, allowing fluctuations between electrical loads at uncertain times. A short-term electric energy consumption forecasting method is needed to determine load growth and distributed power supply. This research aims to use a fuzzy logic algorithm to perform short-term electrical energy consumption forecasting and compare the forecasting results with the actual load at PT Semen Padang. The results showed that short-term load forecasting for seven days using the fuzzy Mamdani method, namely Smallest of Maximum (SoM), obtained a percentage MAPE value of 8.15%. Meanwhile, the Weight of Average (WoA) Sugeno defuzzification method gets a portion of the MAPE value of 9.51%. The Sugeno method is more accurate than the Mamdani method in short-term electricity load forecasting for PPI Indarung V PT Semen Padang. If based on the time category, then forecasting the electricity load on holidays is better than predicting on weekdays. However, when viewed in terms of per day, in Wednesday has the smallest average MAPE value of 5.05%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".