A Hybrid Drying Process: Cylinder Drying with Through Air After-drying
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cylinder drying and air drying of paperHigh paper machine capital costs provide a permanent incentive for increased productivity.Pikulik et al. [1] discussed the evolution of machine speed for printing grades to about 2000m/min.Karlsson [2] considered potential developments for the all too common bottleneck of cylinder drying.Extensive studies at McGill examined the possible integration of impingement air drying with cylinder drying, providing one source concerning multiple technique drying, Bond et al. [3], in hybrid dryer sections, Hashemi and Douglas [4,5].Hybrid drying for printing paper recently became an industrial reality with a dryer section consisting of alternating cylinder and high intensity impingement air drying at the Nordland Papier mill in Germany, Sundqvist and Anderson [6].Thus, although impingement air drying was long considered applicable only to tissue and toweling in Yankee dryers, machine builders now propose the integration of these two techniques to produce hybrid dryer sections for heavier grades.The other basic type of air drying, i.e. through air drying, is distinguished by the manner of air -sheet contacting.In through drying the moisture removal is obtained by drawing hot unsaturated air or combustion gas through the permeable web.For the heat and mass transfer of drying, this intimate contact between the drying medium and wet fibres decreases the distance for transport from the thickness of the sheet for cylinder or
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".