Lithium-rich Cepheid V470 Cas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims. In this Letter, we report the discovery of a new lithium-rich yellow supergiant star – the Cepheid V470 Cas – that has a high lithium abundance, log A(Li) = 3.29. This is highly unusual for supergiant stars. V470 Cas is joining a very select group of lithium-rich Cepheids, with only nine members known to date in our Galaxy. Methods. For the analysis of our high-resolution echelle spectrum obtained at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, methods based on both local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) and non-local thermodynamic equilibrium (NLTE) assumptions were applied. In particular, the lithium abundance was derived by analysing the equivalent width of the 6707 Å line. Results. Most lithium-rich Cepheids are located near the blue edge of the instability strip near the bottom of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Their main sequence progenitors are distributed over a mass range of three to five solar masses. Of the nine lithium-rich Cepheids known, six are double-mode pulsators, including our programme Cepheid. It is very likely that the stars of this small group are entering the instability strip for the first time and have not yet passed the red giant phase. Therefore, they have not experienced the large-scale mixing event that could destroy lithium in their convective zones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".