Regional choroidal thickness estimation from color fundus images based on convolutional neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to estimate the regional choroidal thickness from color fundus images from convolutional neural networks in different network structures and task learning models. Method 1276 color fundus photos and their corresponding choroidal thickness values from healthy subjects were obtained from the Topcon DRI Triton optical coherence tomography machine. Initially, ten commonly used convolutional neural networks were deployed to identify the most accurate model, which was subsequently selected for further training. This selected model was then employed in combination with single-, multiple-, and auxiliary-task training models to predict the average and sub-region choroidal thickness in both ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) grids and 100-grid subregions. The values of mean absolute error and coefficient of determination (R 2 ) were involved to evaluate the models' performance. Results Efficientnet-b0 network outperformed other networks with the lowest mean absolute error value (25.61 μm) and highest R 2 (0.7817) in average choroidal thickness. Incorporating diopter spherical, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness as auxiliary tasks improved predicted accuracy (p-value = 6.39 × 10 − 44 , 2.72 × 10 − 38 , 1.15 × 10 − 36 respectively). For ETDRS regional choroidal thickness estimation, multi-task model achieved better results than single task model (lowest mean absolute error = 31.10 μm vs. 33.20 μm). The multi-task training also can simultaneously predict the choroidal thickness of 100 grids with a minimum mean absolute error of 33.86 μm. Conclusions Efficientnet-b0, in combination with multi-task and auxiliary task models, achieve high accuracy in estimating average and regional macular choroidal thickness directly from color fundus photographs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".