MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392115830 · doi:10.1017/9781805431459.003

From Industrial Heimat to Bavarian Heimatfilm: Sprengbagger 1010, Hunger in Waldenburg, and the Consolidation of a Genre

2023· other· en· W4392115830 on OpenAlexaff
Seth Peabody

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsolidation (business)ArtHistoryBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Various Productions of Die Geierwally show that the same story, remade in various historical moments, can evoke a range of relationships between humans, nonhuman animals, and their environments in diverse configurations that all might be considered within the visual discourse of Heimat . The discussion now turns to two films from the late Weimar era and one from early in the Nazi era that all situate Heimat esque rural sites against urban or industrial landscapes and delineate the relationships between these various environments. While they would not have been described within the genre of Heimatfilm at the time of their release, taken together, they provide insight into trends and tensions within the concept of Heimat before it became solidified in the postwar era as a genre of rural nostalgia. Moreover, when considered within a broader field of filmic discourse that includes filmmakers, critics, and viewers, these films show a shift within the ecologies of Heimat imagery (following Ivakhiv) from an environmental keyword tied to diverse and dynamic environments and discourses, toward the backwards-looking cultural norm that marks the cliched image of Heimat from the 1950s. The films discussed in this chapter sit at the conceptual boundary between the Heimatfilm and industrial film genres, a seemingly contradictory combination that nonetheless recurs with remarkable frequency. Industrial films can be defined as “films made by and for the purposes of industrial and social organizations” and scholars have proposed that they need to be studied in different ways from conventional fiction and documentary films: “Far from constituting self-sufficient entities for aesthetic analysis, industrial and utility films have to be understood in terms of their specific, usually organizational, purpose, and in the very context of power and organizational practice in which they appear.” In place of the auteur theory that often guides film analysis, Thomas Elsaesser proposes that scholars examine the task, triggering context, and target audience ( Auftrag , Anlass , and Adressat ), and Vinzenz Hediger and Patrick Vonderau propose that scholarship on industrial film should examine the “three Rs” of “ record (institutional memory), rhetoric (governance), and rationalization (optimizing process).” While the titles analyzed below are still fiction films, they are grounded in a specific landscape or industrial site and have a primary goal of saying something about that site to an audience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207