MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392116123 · doi:10.1017/9789048542963.002

‘Thys my poore labor to present’: Mary Bassett's Translation of Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History

2023· other· en· W4392116123 on OpenAlexaff
Kirsten Inglis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranslation (biology)HistoryClassicsBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

: Chapter 1 considers Mary Bassett's translation of Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History (BL MS Harley 1860) as a manuscript dedicated to Princes Mary Tudor and intended for circulation among a circle of English Catholic readers. The chapter contextualizes Bassett's translation within the More family's educational tradition and legacy of subversive writing and translation. Bassett's lexical choices reveal her articulation of affinity with a religious and political community. I suggest that these, coupled with the terms of the dedicatory letter to Mary, reveal Bassett's translation of this highly politicized patristic text to be a work that deliberately creates a politicized subject for the view of her readers. Keywords : dedications; Eusebius; Mary Bassett; Mary I; patronage; translation Mary Bassett (c. 1522–1572) is perhaps best known as the granddaughter of Thomas More and the translator of his De Tristitia Christi , printed in 1557 in More's collected English writings. Her translation of the first five books of Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History from Greek into English and Latin is less well known, in part because of its manuscript form, dedicated to the Princess Mary (later Mary I) and now held at the British Library. The Harley catalogue records that the now leather-bound copy of Bassett’s Ecclesiastical History was at one time ‘bound in a Cover of Purple Velvet, Gilt on the Edges, &c. Seemeth to have been the Present-Book to the above mentioned Princess’. Evidence that the manuscript was actually given to Mary is inconclusive, but the elaborate binding and visual presentation of the text itself (with embellished capitals and neatly ruled margins in red) suggests that this was the copy destined for her. Bassett's gift includes a long and detailed dedicatory letter in which she reflects on her methodology and theoretical stance in making the translation. Bassett's voice emerges clearly and confidently from within the conventions of the dedicatory letter and this chapter explores the ways in which her translation and its circulation as a gift to the princess Mary Tudor offered Bassett an opportunity to declare publicly her religious and political affiliations to this controversial figure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical and Linguistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207