A Review of Virbia (Formerly Holomelina) of America North of Mexico (Arctiidae: Arctiinae: Arctinii)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tiger moth genus Virbia Walker (Arctiinae: Arctiini) is redescribed and its biology and taxonomic history are reviewed. The recent placement of Holomelina Herrich-Schäffer as its junior synonym is examined. North of Mexico, 14 Virbia species are recognized, including two new species, V. fergusoni Zaspel and V. rindgei Cardé. Adult habitus photographs, a checklist, diagnoses, and complete descriptions are provided for all species. Genitalia of the new species are illustrated, and diagnostic character illustrations are provided for separating all previously described species. Locality information from over 12,000 specimens representing 16 museum collections [in the United States and Canada] is compiled and available in an electronic database on the Diversity of Life Website (at www.diversityoflife.org/virbia.html). As some species appear to be habitat specialists (e.g., V. lamae in bogs), photos of selected habitats are provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".