MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392122208 · doi:10.1063/4.0000219

Spatial–temporal characterization of photoemission in a streak-mode dynamic transmission electron microscope

2024· article· en· W4392122208 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Dynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsTemporal resolutionStreakImage resolutionOpticsPicosecondMicroscopeFrame ratePhysicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A long-standing motivation driving high-speed electron microscopy development is to capture phase transformations and material dynamics in real time with high spatial and temporal resolution. Current dynamic transmission electron microscopes (DTEMs) are limited to nanosecond temporal resolution and the ability to capture only a few frames of a transient event. With the motivation to overcome these limitations, we present our progress in developing a streak-mode DTEM (SM-DTEM) and demonstrate the recovery of picosecond images with high frame sequence depth. We first demonstrate that a zero-dimensional (0D) SM-DTEM can provide temporal information on any local region of interest with a 0.37 μm diameter, a 20-GHz sampling rate, and 1200 data points in the recorded trace. We use this method to characterize the temporal profile of the photoemitted electron pulse, finding that it deviates from the incident ultraviolet laser pulse and contains an unexpected peak near its onset. Then, we demonstrate a two-dimensional (2D) SM-DTEM, which uses compressed-sensing-based tomographic imaging to recover a full spatiotemporal photoemission profile over a 1.85-μm-diameter field of view with nanoscale spatial resolution, 370-ps inter-frame interval, and 140-frame sequence depth in a 50-ns time window. Finally, a perspective is given on the instrumental modifications necessary to further develop this promising technique with the goal of decreasing the time to capture a 2D SM-DTEM dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it