MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392131502 · doi:10.1002/adsu.202300656

Experimental and Computational Study of Mg and Ta‐Doped Li<sub>7</sub>La<sub>3</sub>Zr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>12</sub> Garnet‐Type Solid Electrolytes for All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

2024· article· en· W4392131502 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Sustainable Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsSolid solutionDopingMaterials scienceFast ion conductorAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrolyteCrystallographyPhysical chemistryInorganic chemistryMineralogyChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Garnet‐type Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 electrolytes have garnered significant attention as promising solid‐state electrolyte candidates in all‐solid‐state lithium batteries (ASSLBs). However, its susceptibility to forming Li 2 CO 3 upon atmospheric exposure leads to performance degradation, limiting its application. This study introduces a co‐doping strategy of Mg and Ta to enhance the properties of garnet electrolytes. Pure cubic Mg and Ta‐doped LLZO electrolytes are successfully synthesized using the solid‐state reaction method. Experimental results, coupled with density functional theory (DFT) calculation, reveal that Mg 2+ doping occurs primarily at the La site (24c). This substitution, given the substantial disparity in ionic radii between Mg 2+ and La 3+ , effectively narrows the transport bottleneck for Li‐ions, resulting in a decreased ionic conductivity and an increased activation energy. Li 6 . 6 La 2 . 8 Mg 0 . 2 Zr 1 . 4 Ta 0 . 6 O 12 exhibits a relative density of ≈92.6%, demonstrating outstanding performance with a room temperature ionic conductivity of 4.31 × 10 −4 S cm −1 and low electronic conductivity of 2.48 × 10 −8 S cm −1 . Notably, after 4 months of atmospheric exposure, its ionic conductivity decreased to ≈78% of the initial value, attributable to Li 2 CO 3 formation. Furthermore, the material demonstrated exceptional long‐term cycle stability over 1000 h at a current density of 0.1 mA cm −2 at 25 °C, indicating effective suppression of Li dendrite formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it