MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392132169 · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03080-y

Band-by-band spectral radiative kernels based on the ERA5 reanalysis

2024· article· en· W4392132169 on OpenAlexafffund
Han Huang, Yi Huang, Qiang Wei, Yongyun Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsRadiative transferRadiationSpectral bandsEnvironmental scienceRadiative fluxKernel (algebra)Flux (metallurgy)BroadbandAtmosphere (unit)Remote sensingAtmospheric sciencesComputational physicsPhysicsMeteorologyMathematicsOpticsMaterials scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiative kernel is a widely adopted method for diagnosing radiation variability and climate feedback. However, most of the existing radiative kernels are broadband flux kernels and lack the spectral information. Motivated by the growing interest in the spectral changes of the Earth radiation budget, we generate a new set of band-by-band radiative kernels based on the fifth generation European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ERA5) reanalysis, which can be used for analyzing the spectrally decomposed changes in the top of atmosphere, surface and atmospheric radiation. The radiative sensitivity quantified by the ERA5 band-by-band kernel is compared to another spectral kernel and validated in a spectral radiation closure test. The use and benefits of the new ERA5 kernels are then demonstrated in an analysis of spectral feedbacks of an ensemble of global climate models (GCMs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207