MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392134068 · doi:10.1515/spma-2023-0113

The diameter of the Birkhoff polytope

2024· article· en· W4392134068 on OpenAlexafffund
Ludovick Bouthat, Javad Mashreghi, Frédéric Morneau-Guérin

Bibliographic record

VenueSpecial Matrices · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversité TÉLUQUniversité Laval
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsPolytopeCombinatoricsBirkhoff polytopeMathematical economicsRegular polygonGeometryConvex set

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The geometry of the compact convex set of all <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mi>n</m:mi><m:mo>×</m:mo><m:mi>n</m:mi></m:math> n\times n doubly stochastic matrices, a structure frequently referred to as the Birkhoff polytope, has been an active subject of research as of late. Geometric characteristics such as the Chebyshev center and the Chebyshev radius with respect to the operator norms from <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:msubsup><m:mrow><m:mi>ℓ</m:mi></m:mrow><m:mrow><m:mi>n</m:mi></m:mrow><m:mrow><m:mi>p</m:mi></m:mrow></m:msubsup></m:math> {\ell }_{n}^{p} to <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:msubsup><m:mrow><m:mi>ℓ</m:mi></m:mrow><m:mrow><m:mi>n</m:mi></m:mrow><m:mrow><m:mi>p</m:mi></m:mrow></m:msubsup></m:math> {\ell }_{n}^{p} and the Schatten <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mi>p</m:mi></m:math> p -norms, both for the range <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mn>1</m:mn><m:mo>≤</m:mo><m:mi>p</m:mi><m:mo>≤</m:mo><m:mi>∞</m:mi></m:math> 1\le p\le \infty , have only recently been studied in depth. In this article, we continue in this vein by determining the diameter of the Birkhoff polytope with respect to the metrics induced by the aforementioned matrix norms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpecial MatricesSame topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207