MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392135293 · doi:10.1093/sf/soae001

Review of “Late Modernity in Crisis: Why We Need a Theory of Society”

2024· article· en· W4392135293 on OpenAlex
John A. Hall

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Forces · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Theory and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernitySociologyLate modernityPolitical sciencePositive economicsDevelopment economicsSocial scienceEpistemologyPolitical economyEconomicsPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Review of "Late Modernity in Crisis: Why We Need a Theory of Society" Get access Review of "Late Modernity in Crisis: Why We Need a Theory of Society" By Andreas Reckwitz and Hartmut Rosa Translated by V.A. Pakis, Polity Press, 2023, 224 pages. Prices: $69.95 (cloth) / $24.95 (paper). https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=late-modernity-in-crisis-why-we-need-a-theory-of-society--9781509556298 John A Hall John A Hall McGill University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, soae001, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soae001 Published: 23 February 2024 Article history Received: 14 November 2023 Accepted: 30 November 2023 Published: 23 February 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it