MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392136202 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae578

An extreme ultra-compact X-ray binary in a globular cluster: multiwavelength observations of RZ 2109 explored in a triple system framework

2024· article· en· W4392136202 on OpenAlexafffund
Kristen C. Dage, Arash Bahramian, Smadar Naoz, Alexey Bobrick, Wasundara Athukoralalage, McKinley C. Brumback, Daryl Haggard, Arunav Kundu, Stephen E. Zepf

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSpace Telescope Science InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsGlobular clusterAstrophysicsBinary numberCluster (spacecraft)AstronomyX-ray binaryGalaxyNeutron star

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The globular cluster ultraluminous X-ray source, RZ 2109, is a complex and unique system that has been detected at X-ray, ultraviolet, and optical wavelengths. Based on almost 20 yr of Chandra and XMM–Newton observations, the X-ray luminosity exhibits order of magnitude variability, with the peak flux lasting on the order of a few hours. We perform robust time series analysis on the archival X-ray observations and find that this variability is periodic on a time-scale of 1.3 ± 0.04 d. The source also demonstrates broad [O iii] λ5007 emission, which has been observed since 2004, suggesting a white dwarf donor and therefore an ultra-compact X-ray binary. We present new spectra from 2020 and 2022, marking 18 yr of observed [O iii] emission from this source. Meanwhile, we find that the globular cluster counterpart is unusually bright in the NUV/UVW2 band. Finally, we discuss RZ 2109 in the context of the eccentric Kozai–Lidov mechanism and show that the observed 1.3 d periodicity can be used to place constraints on the tertiary configuration, ranging from 20 min (for a 0.1 M⊙ companion) to approximately 95 min (for a 1 M⊙ companion), if the eccentric Kozai–Lidov mechanism is at the origin of the periodic variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→