MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392136841 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51042-7_4

A University Professor, and Establishing New Institutes

2024· book-chapter· en· W4392136841 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Herwig Schopper, James Gillies

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer biographies · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Science, and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNobilityQuarter (Canadian coin)PerfectionArt historyArtHumanitiesEngineeringHistoryClassicsArchaeologyLawPolitical scienceTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract When Herwig arrived in Erlangen in 1956, it was a town of some 60,000 inhabitants, dominated by the university, and the industrial powerhouse, Siemens. Historically, the town had been a seat of nobility, and the Margrave’s castle is still a dominant feature. In 1685, when Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes, the Margrave gave refuge to Huguenots fleeing France, even going so far as to build an entire new quarter, Erlangen Neustadt, to house them. It set the town on a course of growth. Another development that shaped the modern-day town came the following century, with the establishment of the university in 1743. Today, housed in a new modern campus, the Friedrich-Alexander University bears the names of the Margrave who established it, and another who later expanded it, cementing its place in the fabric of the town. Many famous scientists have worked at the university including Georg Simon Ohm, whose name became the unit for electrical resistance, and mathematician Emmy Noether, whose eponymous theorem links symmetry to conservation laws—a tenet that underpins much of modern physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpringer biographiesSame topicPhilosophy, Science, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207