A hybridized feature extraction for COVID-19 multi-class classification on computed tomography images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
COVID-19 has killed more than 5 million individuals worldwide within a short time. It is caused by SARS-CoV-2 which continuously mutates and produces more transmissible new different strains. It is therefore of great significance to diagnose COVID-19 early to curb its spread and reduce the death rate. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, traditional diagnostic methods such as reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are ineffective for diagnosis. Medical imaging is among the most effective techniques of respiratory disorders detection through machine learning and deep learning. However, conventional machine learning methods depend on extracted and engineered features, whereby the optimum features influence the classifier's performance. In this study, Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG) and eight deep learning models were utilized for feature extraction while K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) were used for classification. A combined feature of HOG and deep learning feature was proposed to improve the performance of the classifiers. VGG-16 + HOG achieved 99.4 overall accuracy with SVM. This indicates that our proposed concatenated feature can enhance the SVM classifier's performance in COVID-19 detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".