Modalidades de acción socioeducativa especializada con padres en situación de riesgo social: estudio comparado
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente artículo presenta un análisis comparado de las modalidades de acción socioeducativa especializada en medios familiares que se dan en Canadá (Québec) y España (Catalunya) con la finalidad de llegar a conclusiones y aprendizajes transferibles entre ambas regiones.Este estudio de pedagogía comparada es el resultado de una investigación de campo centrada en aquellas acciones socioeducativas destinadas a la prevención de situaciones de riesgo social que vive la infancia, causadas por un mal ejercicio de las tareas educativas de sus padres. El creciente interés de las instituciones sociales y educativas por prevenir, las situaciones que provocan problemas de socialización en la infancia, hace que estudios de este tipo puedan ofrecer pautas para la innovación y la génesis de nuevos programas.Descriptores: familia protección de la infancia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".