Evaluation of Reverse Osmosis Water Quality in Diwaniyah Governorate/ Iraq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
: The Canadian guideline for assessing the quality of drinking water treated by reverse osmosis (R.O.) was applied at Al- Diwaniyah Governorate/Iraq and some of its districts (Al-Hamza-Afak -Shamiya). Water samples were collected monthly from Twelve selected stations starting from August to October 2022. The physical, chemical, and microbial parameters of the reverse osmosis treated water were studied and laboratory tests for water samples were conducted. The results aligned within the Iraqi standard and the World Health Organization specification and did not exceed the permissible limit. The results of the microbial tests indicated that there was no bacterial contamination of the reverse osmosis treated water in all stations during the study period,. The results of the water quality guide (CCME WQI) for evaluating reverse osmosis water for drinking purposes indicated that the reverse osmosis-treated water was within the category (moderate- good) during the study period and for all sites. Keywords : Diwaniyah City, CCME WQI, Reverse Osmosis Treated Water R.O.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".